A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Bastawisy M(1), Gameel T, Radwan M, Ramadan A, Alkathiri M, Omar A. Author information: (1)Department of Urology, Tanta University, 20 Bahr Street, Tanta, Egypt.

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in

2019-9-1  Proximal stone migration was prevented in 17 of 20 patients in the lidocaine jelly group giving 85% success rate versus 100% success rate in Stone Cone group with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Similarly, the stone-free rate in the Stone Cone group was 100% (20/20) versus 85% (17/20) in the lidocaine jelly group.

(PDF) A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy.pdf Available via license: CC BY-NC Content may be subject to

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in

The Stone Cone is safe and efficient in preventing proximal stone migration during ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy. It maintained continuous ureteral access and demonstrated a statistically significant advantage over the lidocaine jelly in terms of proximal stone migration, operative time, and t

497 A comparison of stone cone versus lidocaine jelly

Request PDF On Feb 1, 2012, M.G. Soliman and others published 497 A comparison of stone cone versus lidocaine jelly in prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy . By Mohamed Bastawisy, Tarek Gameel, Mohamed Radwan, Ahmed Ramadan, Mutie Alkathiri and Adel Omar. Abstract.

Stone cone取石网在82例经尿道输尿管镜碎石术中的应用

[6] BASTAWISY M,GAMEEL T, RADWAN M,et al.A comparison of Stone cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy [J].Ther Adv Urol,2011,3(5):203-210.

Devices to help combat stone retropulsion during

2019-8-25  A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol 2011 ; 3: 203

Efficacy of the Stone Cone for Treatment of Proximal

2019-9-9  A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy 19 October 2011 Therapeutic Advances in Urology, Vol. 3, No. 5 A Randomized Prospective Controlled Study for Assessment of Different Ureteral Occlusion Devices in Prevention of Stone Migration During Pneumatic

Safety and efficacy of using the stone cone and an

2015-6-1  M. Bastawisy, T. Gameel, M. Radwan, A. Ramadan, M. Alkathiri, A. OmarA comparison of stone cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy Ther Adv Urol, 3 (2011), pp. 203-210

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy By Mohamed Bastawisy, Tarek Gameel, Mohamed Radwan, Ahmed Ramadan, Mutie Alkathiri and Adel Omar

Assessment of Novel Ureteral Occlusion Device and

2019-9-9  A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy 19 October 2011 Therapeutic Advances in Urology, Vol. 3, No. 5 A Randomized Prospective Controlled Study for Assessment of Different Ureteral Occlusion Devices in Prevention of Stone Migration During Pneumatic

bastawisy PubMed Result

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol. 2011 Oct;3(5):203-10. doi: 10.1177/1756287211419551.

Safety and efficacy of using the stone cone and an

Several reports recommended many different materials and devices for preventing retrograde stone displacement during ureteric lithotripsy, including lidocaine jelly, ureteric baskets, the stone cone and recently, thermophilic polymers [4,5,12–19]. The reported operative duration of ureteroscopy is 18–93 min .

Devices for Stone Management SpringerLink

Bastawisy M, Gameel T, Radwan M, Ramadan A, Alkathiri M, Omar A. A comparison of stone cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol. 2011;3:203–10. PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar

Cureus Inadvertent Stone Migration During

Most of these devices are disposable, hence one must be able to fairly justify their added cost vis-à-vis benefits. A study by Ursiny et al. reviewed occlusion devices including BackStop, NTrap, the Stone Cone, and lidocaine jelly, and found that these devices would be cost-effective when the proximal migration rate was greater than 6.3%.

Revista Chilena de Urología

5. Dretler SP. The stone cone: a new generation of basketry. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1593-1596. 6. Bastawisy M, Gameel T, Radwan M, Ahmed Ramadan et al: A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol 2011; 3(5): 203-210 7.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (UHLL) as two minimally invasive procedures in managing obstructive upper

输尿管结石诊断治疗指南_年全文版_百度文库

2019-5-4  The Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent ureteral stone migration- the initial clinical experience [J]. J Urol, 2002, 167(5):1985-1988. 11.Maislos SD, Volpe M, Albert PS, RaboyA. Efficacy of the Stone Cone for treatment of proximal ureteral stones.J Endourol

Uso rutinario del dispositivo antimigratorio

J Urol 2003;169:881-885. 5. Dretler SP. The stone cone: a new generation of basketry. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1593-1596. 6. Bastawisy M, Gameel T, Radwan M, Ahmed Ramadan et al: A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol 2011; 3(5): 203-210 7.

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy By Mohamed Bastawisy, Tarek Gameel, Mohamed Radwan, Ahmed Ramadan, Mutie Alkathiri and Adel Omar

Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current

2014-6-3  A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther. Adv. Urol. 3, 203–210

bastawisy PubMed Result

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol. 2011 Oct;3(5):203-10. doi: 10.1177/1756287211419551.

محمد جابر بسطويسى سليمان-mohamed gaber bastawysy soliman

A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy ,October 2011 جهة النشر Therapeutoc advances of Urology نوع البحث مشترك

Revista Chilena de Urología

5. Dretler SP. The stone cone: a new generation of basketry. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1593-1596. 6. Bastawisy M, Gameel T, Radwan M, Ahmed Ramadan et al: A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol 2011; 3(5): 203-210 7.

Vol. 4: Issue 6 UroToday

2020-12-28  A rigid endoscope (8.5 to 11.5 Fr) was used in all cases. Local anesthesia consists of lidocaine jelly in the bladder associated with a penile nerve block in males only, and without any intravenous analgesia. Ureteroscopy was done for stone fragmentation with

Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (UHLL) as two minimally invasive procedures in managing obstructive upper

Uso rutinario del dispositivo antimigratorio

J Urol 2003;169:881-885. 5. Dretler SP. The stone cone: a new generation of basketry. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1593-1596. 6. Bastawisy M, Gameel T, Radwan M, Ahmed Ramadan et al: A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol 2011; 3(5): 203-210 7.

The Best Low-Carb Ice Cream Brands to Try

Ice cream is usually high in sugar and carbs, but several ice cream brands are now offering no-sugar-added alternatives for anyone on a low-carb or keto diet.

输尿管结石诊断治疗指南-年全文版_百度文库

2018-1-8  The Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent ureteral stone migration- the initial clinical experience [J]. J Urol, 2002, 167(5):1985-1988. 11.Maislos SD, Volpe M, Albert PS, RaboyA. Efficacy of the Stone Cone for treatment of proximal ureteral stones.J Endourol